
From
Challenge # 83
January-February 2004
Trading Tanks for Workers
Michal Freedman
ON APRIL 11, 2003, Ruth Sinai of Ha'aretz
uncovered a deal between the Israeli military industry (Ta'as) and Turkey:
the latter granted Ta'as a contract to upgrade 170 Patton tanks for $687
million. This is the biggest arms-export deal in the history of Israel's
Defense Ministry. It will undoubtedly strengthen the close strategic
relationship between the two countries.
The blessing is a mixed one, however. It is
accepted practice that when states make arms deals, the seller compensates
the buyer in an arrangement known as an "offset". In this case, Israel,
the seller, has committed itself to buying goods or services from Turkey
worth $800 million over a period of 20 years. Like many third world
countries, however, Turkey has little to offer Israel except water and
cheap labor – the hottest item in the Israeli construction market.
Israel intended at first to buy water. Its
requirements could have reached $50 million per year, but the Ministry of
Finance decided that the price was too high. Israeli businessmen, seeking
to strengthen relations with Turkey, put pressure on Ta'as and government
officials to compensate the Turks by importing construction workers.
Unemployment in Turkey is 10.8% (plus an underemployment rate of 6%).
Construction workers in Turkey earn $200 a month. In Israel, such a
worker, it was said, could earn $700 – or more with overtime.
The Knesset Committee on Foreign Workers discussed
the issue on November 25, with the Workers Advice Center (WAC)
taking part. According to the Finance and Interior ministries, the
decision to import Turkish workers had come from the Prime Minister's
Office in February. Ariel Sharon had blessed the clandestine deal; in
April, 800 workers had arrived. Circumventing normal procedures, Sharon's
decision was a major departure from official policy, as we shall now see.
AT THE END of 2002, after pressure from the Ministry of
Finance, the government decided that the construction industry could
supply its needs from the pool of migrant workers already in the country,
as well as from local labor. It stopped issuing permits for the import of
new workers. This policy became known by the infelicitous term, "Closed
Skies".
As part of "Tanks for Workers", however, a private
Turkish construction firm named Yilmazlar (operating in Israel since the
mid-90's) got permits for 800 workers despite the Closed Skies policy –
and without having to follow standard procedures. A senior source told
Ruth Sinai that the company then phoned contractors whose applications for
import permits had been turned down, offering workers – with a stiff
agent's fee attached. (Ha'aretz April 11.)
In the Knesset meeting of November 25, committee
chairperson Ran Cohen asked the Ta'as representatives whether they were
talking about 800 workers only. Tali Friedman, responsible for reciprocal
agreements in the military industries, clarified that 800 workers would
not be enough. Israel, she said, will need to import thousands more in
order to fulfill its commitments. It will need to put $40 million annually
into the Turkish market for a period of 20 years.
We may make a simple calculation. If the annual
wage of a Turkish worker is $8400, then Israeli firms will need to employ,
on average, 4,762 Turkish construction workers each year for the 20 years.
Turkey is not the only state with which Israel has
reciprocal deals. India and China are on the list. On the day after the
discussion in the Knesset Committee, an article appeared in Ha'aretz
entitled "Mongolia's foreign minister has a small request: a quota of
foreign workers" (Dalia Shehori, November 26). The Turkish divergence is
likely to become the norm. If that happens, the import of migrant workers
will have become a goal in itself. Million-dollar deals will take
precedence, even if this means abandoning local workers – especially
Arabs, who may be forced to take to the skies themselves.
Special Exceptions for Yilmazlar
The neat
arrangement between Israel and Turkey appears in a more sinister light
when one looks into Yilmazlar. WAC presented a document to the Knesset
Committee on Foreign Workers, making serious charges against the company.
WAC based these charges on testimonies from workers who ran away from
Yilmazlar (see box, p.12). According to WAC:
1. Workers
receive their wages without any wage slip and without any reference to the
number of hours they have worked. Wages are paid directly to their bank
accounts in Turkey, making it difficult for them to check the sum. In
addition, there is a time lag of two months before the wages are paid.
This procedure is illegal. Israeli law stipulates a fine of 40% of the
wage per month on employers who fail to pay on time.
2: The
company breaks the minimum wage law (18 shekels or NIS – about $4.00 – per
hour). It does not abide by the collective agreements in the construction
industry, although these agreements include migrant workers. According to
WAC's calculations, the Turkish workers make NIS 12 – 15 per hour.
3: The
company retains the workers' passports. The worker keeps only a photocopy.
Israeli law forbids a company to confiscate the passports of its
employees.
4: Workers'
living conditions do not comply with the law concerning the employment of
foreign workers.

ACCORDING
to Sigal Rozen of the Hotline for Migrant Workers, the Ministry of Trade
has been receiving complaints against Yilmazlar since 1999. These did not
affect the Turkish and Israeli decision, however, to give this company the
privilege of profiting from the deal. In response to WAC's accusations,
the Ta'as representatives at the Knesset committee claimed that both Ta'as
and the Turkish government had thoroughly checked Yilmazlar. The Turks,
they said, had submitted a report confirming their satisfaction. Yet Ta'as
and Turkey are interested parties. Officially, the body that ought to
check the complaints is Israel's Employment Authority. Even here there is
a problem, however. Because Yilmazlar has the PM's blessing, it seems
unlikely that the Employment Authority will take effective measures.
Pending a truly independent investigation, the company will continue
obtaining permits that, in effect, enable it to violate the same laws over
and over.
WAC's charges point to another special privilege
enjoyed by Yilmazlar. In 2002, human rights organizations criticized the
practice of binding migrant workers to a company by taking their
passports. In response, the Knesset amended the law. A worker who leaves
his job now has the right to find work elsewhere, on condition that his
new employer get a visa for him from the Ministry of Interior. In this way
the worker can maintain legal status. WAC has discovered, however, that
this law is not enforced in the case of Yilmazlar. Here is the testimony
of D (his full name is with WAC), who tried to help workers who had left
Yilmazlar to find jobs elsewhere:
"I work in another company, and I know very well
what happens to Turkish workers in Israel. When workers who'd left
Yilmazlar came to me, I suggested they get new passports from the Turkish
consulate in Tel Aviv (since Yilmazlar had confiscated them – M.F.), and
then I would help them contact another company that would get them visas.
Even with new passports, though, there was no way to get new work permits
for workers who'd been with Yilmazlar. The Interior Ministry in Haifa told
me that workers from Yilmazlar come with a special visa, and the option
for them is either to continue with the company or to return to Turkey.
"Another thing. Other companies get fined large
sums nowadays for confiscating employees' passports. Not Yilmazlar. When
the surveillance unit catches a Yilmazlar worker who holds only a
photocopy of his passport, the managers sort things out and the matter is
closed."
In 2002, as said, the government decided to "close the
skies" in order to re-open jobs to local workers, including Arab laborers
who had been displaced by cheap, unorganized migrant labor. It has not
stood by its decision. On the contrary, it manages the labor market in
construction like a national mafia. With one hand it recently expelled
some 50,000 "illegal" migrant workers – that is, people who tried to
escape exploitation, going underground – and now it lays the groundwork
for bringing in thousands of cheap, exploitable "legal" ones.
n
Testimonies of the
Yilmazar Employees
Khitam
Na'amneh
Below
are extracts from the testimonies of Yilmazlar workers who came as
part of the "Tanks for Workers" deal. They have requested that we do
not reveal their names.
A: "I
approached Yilmazlar in Turkey when I heard there was a chance of
working in Israel. They made us sign contracts on which no wage was
mentioned. I agreed after they promised us that the wage of every
worker would be at least $700 per month, and that if we were ready
to put in additional hours we could earn a monthly wage of
$1000-$1200. When we arrived in Israel, they made us sign a document
in Hebrew at the airport; I don't know what was written on it. I
signed because we were under pressure and I didn't want to cause
problems.
"For
the first two months they didn't pay us at all, except NIS 500 for
ongoing expenses. This was the same for all the company's workers.
Only after two months, my wife in Turkey told me that $518 had been
put into my bank account. The next month I received a similar sum.
Together with the NIS 500, that comes to $600-$650 for a month of at
least 250 hours' work. We work ten hours a day, six days a week, and
sometimes also on Saturdays. I have no way of knowing how many hours
they record, but I feel they are simply not writing down work hours
– in practice they are forging the list of hours."
B: "I
came with another group. The sign-up procedure and the promises
about wages were similar. When we arrived at the building site it
became apparent that no living quarters had been arranged. They put
us in containers, eight people to each. There is no hot water, and
the washrooms are inhuman. The food is tasteless and always the
same: in the morning, bread and cheese and jam, and in the evening,
potatoes, beans and rice.
"Worst of all are the relations with the managers and supervisors.
At 4:30 in the morning all the workers are awakened in order to get
to the site by 6:00. A supervisor demands that the workers be back
at the containers every night by 10:00, including Fridays and
Saturdays. They allow us to watch television only between 9:00 and
10:00, and even then the supervisor determines which program we
watch. At 10:00, they turn off the television and make us turn off
the lights as if we were in prison."
C: "I
work with B. The relations at work are humiliating and terrible. I
work in ceramics. In this line of work, there is always someone who
helps the professional, bringing him material and assisting. Here
they make us all work alone. A supervisor forbids us to smoke or
talk on the mobile. If they catch you, you lose one hour of work.
"Because wages aren't paid on time and are lower than what was
promised, and also because of the oppression and humiliation, we
decided to leave the company. Our passports are in the company
offices, though. We are workers without passports. At any moment the
police might catch us and take us to jail. Also, we receive
threatening phone calls, demanding that we return to work with
Yilmazlar. We run from place to place in order to avoid the police.
Our attempts to approach another company for visas have also
failed." |
|
WAC unites Arab
and migrant workers
A
group of Arab workers organized by WAC labors at the same building
site as a group of migrants from Turkey. They have forged a
relationship of solidarity and cooperation. Through their
affiliation with WAC, the Arabs receive full social benefits
according to collective agreements in the construction industry. The
Turkish migrants, for their part, arrived in Israel within the usual
framework of indentured servitude and escaped their first employers.
Under threat of arrest and deportation, they negotiated for a wage
like that prescribed by collective agreement: 25 shekels per hour.
Only after achieving this did they agree to work for their new
company, Solel Boneh, which went and got new work permits for them.
Solidarity between
local and migrant workers is a principal goal of WAC. It is the only
way to ensure that employers will not succeed in dividing workers,
exploiting the migrants in order to destroy the attempts of local
workers to stay organized. To preserve workers' rights, all must be
organized for united action – without regard to nationality or
religion. |
For related articles, please visit WAC's
web page: WAC Home